Pages

Sunday, July 19, 2020

"Cracka" review





No. 2,556


White Man’s Burden” is a solar distance in theme and production from “Cracka,”  It is sympathetic to whites, even though the story is complicated and ends on a “positive” note. At dinner, wealthy black CEO Thaddeus Thomas discusses white people and claims they are "genetically inferior" because the children grow up without fathers. Where have we heard that before (link to Yusra Khogali? The story occurs in an “altenate” history, as well. The Daily Mail (UK) wrote: “The upcoming film 'Cracka' depicts a man with neo-Nazi tattoos being magically transported back to an alternate history in which whites are enslaved by blacks in America.” It’s not the America I know, nor is it recognizable by anyone else.

“Cracka” is a vicious film intended, among other agendas, to appeal to the raw emotions of people seeking  “social justice” for blacks. There is no mention of BLM’s connection to it, but from what little of its “preview” of it I’ve seen of it, I see the same hatred the BLM is noted for.the hatred is its trademark. To the BLM, all whites are “Nazis,” or “subhuman.”

I suspect, from a writer’s perspective, that “White Man’s Burden” was purloined to turn it into a BLM product. that suited its anti-white agenda. . As a Porlland Oregon spokesman puts it, their mission is the “abolition of the United States as we know it.”

Other than the "artistic license" used to depict the gratuitous persecution of the "Neo Nazi" by blacks, there is little or no merit to the film. Its purpose is to convey the message: "How does it feel to be oppressed?" As though the film maker and the cast really knew how it felt, being centuries removed from actual slavery. I may watch the full film when Amazon releases it, but I'm doubtful I will. You can get your stomach turned only once.

The purpose of “Cracka” is no less ambitious in its destructive goal.

2 comments:

  1. Adamant, principled opposition to all of these eruptions of "woke" racism is the only proper moral response. That it is now becoming so dangerous to make such a stand -- to one's livelihood at least, and life itself in an increasing number of instances -- just shows how dire the situation has become.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Agreed. Which is why I chose to review the Amazon filth they're promising us.

    ReplyDelete

The Center for the Advancement of Capitalism reserves the right to monitor comments and remove any that it deems, in its sole discretion, to be abusive, defamatory, in violation of the copyright, trademark right, or other intellectual property right of any third party, or otherwise inappropriate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Center for the Advancement of Capitalism is not obligated to take any such actions, and will not be responsible or liable for comments posted on its website(s).

For the Center's full comments policy, please see:
CAC Comments Policy