Prime Minister Theresa May has said “phooey” on the Magna Carta and
British liberties and ordered the arrest of Tommy Robinson on a specious charge
of “disturbing the peace.” He was live streaming a report on the trial of a group
of Muslim “groomer” rapists outside a Leeds courthouse, out of earshot of the judge,
the defendants, lawyers and jurors – technically not even on the courthouse
property – when a bevy of policemen swooped in and arrested him.
![]() |
| The knights of the Crescent Table at work |
Mark
Steyn writes:
On Friday, Robinson was live-streaming
(from his telephone) outside Leeds Crown Court where last week's Grooming Gang
of the Week were on trial for "grooming" - the useless euphemism for
industrial-scale child gang rape and sex slavery by large numbers of Muslim men
with the active connivance (as I pointed out to the Sky guys) of every organ of
the state: social workers, police, politicians. Oh, and also the media….
Tommy
Robinson, a journalist for Rebel Media, was
arrested, detained, taken to another courthouse, judged, sentenced, and taken
to Hull Prison, all within a matter of minutes. Not only that, but the judge
who sentenced him to thirteen months in
prison, decreed a blanket
news blackout on his arrest and also on the trial of the grooming gang.
Newspapers and their Internet sites that had reported the body-snatching were
obliged to “scrub” their stories, under penalty of law if they did not.
Robinson was
taken with the government\judicial tool of a “bill of
attainder,” which one legal site site defines as:
Definition: A legislative act that
singles out an individual or group for punishment without a trial.
The Free Legal
Dictionary notes:
A
special legislative enactment that imposes a death sentence without a judicial trial
upon a particular person or class of persons suspected of committing serious offenses,
such as Treason
or a felony.
A bill of attainder
is prohibited by Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 of the Constitution because it deprives
the person or persons singled out for punishment of the safeguards of a trial
by jury.
A bill of
attainder does not necessarily entail a death sentence. In Robinson’s case, it just means “disappearing”
from public sight, as dissidents did in Argentina and Chile in the last century.
Steyn wrote:
So on Friday
he was outside the Crown Court in Leeds. He was not demonstrating, or accosting
or chanting, or much speaking. He was just pointing his mobile phone upon the
scene from a distance. Within minutes, seven coppers showed up in whatever they
use instead of a Black Maria these days, tossed him inside it and drove off. In
other words, these were not "investigating officers" called to the
scene: They showed up with the intent to take him away. Within hours, he was
tried, convicted and gaoled - at HM Prison Hull, a Category B chokey, or one
level below maximum security. The judge in the case, one Geoffrey Marson, spent
all of four minutes on trying, convicting and sentencing Robinson. It is not
clear whether that leisurely tribunal included his order expressly forbidding
"any
report on these proceedings" (the case is Regina vs Yaxley-Lennon
because that's Robinson's real name).
Robinson’s “trial”
was more like a military “drum head”
trial than a civilian trial. Frankly, the prohibition of all news about his
arrest does not even constitute a “D-notice,”
but rather a plain case of classic railroading to get rid of someone likely to
shed light on the forty years of Muslim grooming and the Shania enslaving of
British girls and children in a vast prostitution ring about which the government
had done little or nothing.
This is why
Britain needs a Constitution like our own, complete with a First Amendment and
with a prohibition of bills of attainder. Robinson was initially charged with “disturbing
the peace.” However, the street on which Robinson was pacing outside the
courthouse was virtually empty; it was indeed, empty and peaceful, until the
cops showed up. No noisy mob of Muslims was there demonstrating and threatening
to kill or injure him or any passersby. There weren’t even any supporters
cheering him on.
What part of
the Magna Carta does Theresa May snort at while clutching to power as she sells
out Britain and Brexit? There are two clauses in it which May has put in her personal
memory hole:
(38) In future no official shall place
a man on trial upon his own unsupported statement, without producing credible
witnesses to the truth of it.
(39) No free man shall be seized or
imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or
deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against
him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by
the law of the land.
This is not
what Robinson was afforded.
The Magna
Carta over the centuries produced Parliament (from the 25 Barons who
arm-twisted King John into signing it) and common law. There is a lot in the
document that concerns the issues of his time and which are completely foreign
to modern minds.
And so May
has just snapped her fingers at the principles. Doubtless all the civil servants,
corrupt police and social “servants” in her train have applauded her and
breathed sighs of relief.



This is the saddest thing that has happened to England in my lifetime. That and the disturbed mentalities that made the incident possible. The king is dead and may this parliament die with him.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteThe arrest of British free speech activist Tommy Robinson has sent shockwaves across the Anglosphere. The United Kingdom, once dedicated to the values of freedom, has taken a path toward authoritarian government and away from freedom. The once great nation, which created the Magna Carta and once commanded an empire, is now the land of tyranny. Unless the British people love their freedom enough and fight this injustice in fierce fashion, it will remain a land silenced by intimidation and fear.
The authoritarian socialist government of the United Kingdom has been out to get Robinson for years on anything it can. It has harassed, intimidated, arrested, and incarcerated Robinson, as it did last May, since it is now apparently a "crime" to report on the decades-long systematic rape of hundreds of non-Muslim children by gangs of Muslim men, who are now apparently a protected class of people. Lizzie Dearden of the Independent reported that Robinson was arrested for "breaching the peace," no doubt an absurd pretense by the British authorities in light of the documented film footage of his actions.
Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/06/tommy_robinson_disappears_free_speech_in_england_is_dead.html#ixzz5I9YmaObH
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
If gangs of white men had spent decades torturing and raping little Muslim girls and a justly outraged Muslim reporter were covering the case, in a similar manner as Robinson, would he be arrested?
ReplyDeleteWe all know that the answer is "no," and we know why. The U.K. is so invested in its politically correct multiculturalism diversity project that it has applied a different treatment of Muslims under the law, which accepts the diversity of legal systems and places the country on a path toward ruin.
Diversity of treatment under the law fragments societies. Diversity in this sense cannot ever work unless moral values remain constant. If freedom of speech is a value and a virtue, can any free nation really tolerate the intolerant and those who violently oppose freedom of speech?
Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/06/tommy_robinson_disappears_free_speech_in_england_is_dead.html#ixzz5I9Z7zKLi
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook