Saturday, July 28, 2018

The Untouchables


Ness did not need to deal with Islam
An alternate title for this column is “The Untouchables.” No, it isn’t about Eliot Ness and his team of Treasury Department agents fighting crime in 1930s Chicago. Rather, it is about why the West cannot repel the corroding incursions of Islam.

We’ve seen one country after another submit to Islam and defer to it and to Muslim sensibilities and demands: Germany leading the pack, France, Belgium, the U.K., the Netherlands, Spain, Canada…and now Australia? It’s akin to the domino effect; Islam is for some reason irresistible to the conquest of the West by Islam, per the 1991 memorandum of The Brotherhood:

 “The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

One can be arrested or penalized for questioning Islam in any of the aforementioned countries or for casting doubt on its state-granted protected status. Responsible for the surrenders is Political Correctness; of publically refraining from criticizing Islam is because it might “offend” Muslims or “hurt their feelings.”  The defenders are afraid to question Islam – ignoring its brutal, blood-soaked history and the life of Mohammad as reported in the Koran, the Hadith, and relevant documents – for the same reason they will not question Christianity’s ethics or history, because Islam is touted first and foremost as a “religion.”

Almost invariably, defenders assert that the West is founded on Judeo-Christian morality of selflessness and self-sacrific; they might even say that Islam is incompatible with Western ideas of freedom of speech, liberty, and other “traditions.”

But I think the real reason Islam can walk all over the West is because the West’s defenders can think of no argument against it. Refuting Islam would take them to where they will not go. Islam can make immigrational beachheads, per the MB memorandum, in countries like Australia, with impunity and get away with it. From these beachheads come the “radicalized” jihadists who kill, stab, blow up infidels, and run them over once they have inculcated the fact that Islam is an anathema to the West. They do not dare question Islam because they will not question Christianity’s religious “heritage,” either, even though historically the Catholic Church was an enemy of the Enlightenment.

Metaphysically, the Western God little differs from Islam’s Allah, or from Casper the Friendly Ghost. In all of Christianity’s history (one of my favorite analogies), and as in Christianity about God, in Islam, the deity’s physical appearance has always been a fanciful conjecture and a figment of imagination. Neither imaginary deity has ever made an appearance among men to prove his existence; one’s belief in God or Allah has always been based on “belief,” or “faith,” as unsubstantiated evidence and constantly elusive from the evidence of our senses. But Islam is more than a “religion,” as it is a political agenda to be imposed, by hook or crook, on the West. God doing a walk-on for men would be an historical event, provided it was even possible.

But is Australia giving in? Read Lauren Southern’s experience in Sydney when confronted with a high ranking police officer.

AU News  Canadian YouTube personality Lauren Southern has broadcast another video fail during her Australian tour. Flanked by seven security guards, Southern visited the area in an attempt to expose the western Sydney suburb, which has a significant Muslim population, as a “no-go zone.”

Southern claimed there were “heads turning” as soon as she and her guards and film crew hit the streets of Lakemba [a Sydney neighborhood, heavily Muslim]. “Men started yelling in Arabic across the street at us,” she said. When she tried to interview passers-by and “criticize Islam” outside Lakemba mosque, the 23-year-old was halted by local police who stopped her, saying they had “grave concerns” about what she planned to do.

Her presence there, the police officer said, would constitute a “breach of the peace,” and were she or her camera crew attacked or harassed, she would be blamed and would be arrested, not the force initiating Muslims. Her presence would “trigger” aggressive and probably violence Muslims, because they’d be “offended” if Southern said anything negative about Islam. It; looks like Southern would be banned from Australia, as she has been from the U.K.

“As far as I’m concerned, this is Sharia, and Lakeamba is a conquered land,” Southern wrote.

Religion is mystical.  Ayn Rand explains it best:

Since religion is a primitive form of philosophy—an attempt to offer a comprehensive view of reality—many of its myths are distorted, dramatized allegories based on some element of truth, some actual, if profoundly elusive, aspect of man’s existence….

In mankind’s history, art began as an adjunct (and, often, a monopoly) of religion. Religion was the primitive form of philosophy: it provided man with a comprehensive view of existence. Observe that the art of those primitive cultures was a concretization of their religion’s metaphysical and ethical abstractions….

It has often been noted that a proof of God would be fatal to religion: a God susceptible of proof would have to be finite and limited; He would be one entity among others within the universe, not a mystic omnipotence transcending science and reality. What nourishes the spirit of religion is not proof, but faith, i.e., the undercutting of man’s mind….

The good, say the mystics of spirit, is God, a being whose only definition is that he is beyond man’s power to conceive—a definition that invalidates man’s consciousness and nullifies his concepts of existence. . . . Man’s mind, say the mystics of spirit, must be subordinated to the will of God. . . . Man’s standard of value, say the mystics of spirit, is the pleasure of God, whose standards are beyond man’s power of comprehension and must be accepted on faith . . . The purpose of man’s life . . . is to become an abject zombie who serves a purpose he does not know, for reasons he is not to question.


About Christ, Rand says:

Christ, in terms of the Christian philosophy, is the human ideal. He personifies that which men should strive to emulate. Yet, according to the Christian mythology, he died on the cross not for his own sins but for the sins of the nonideal people. In other words, a man of perfect virtue was sacrificed for men who are vicious and who are expected or supposed to accept that sacrifice. If I were a Christian, nothing could make me more indignant than that: the notion of sacrificing the ideal to the nonideal, or virtue to vice. And it is in the name of that symbol that men are asked to sacrifice themselves for their inferiors. That is precisely how the symbolism is used.

Islam's way of "preaeful" conversion
If the West’s defenders adopted the philosophy of reason, they would have no trouble refuting Islam or its alleged “superiority” over Christianity or any other religion, either, and thus rebuff all attempts to insinuate itself into the West.

To hate something, is to fear it. To see and treat it as a mortal threat to one’s values.  Or not. Most Western defenders do not see Islam as a threat. It buys the whole Islamic package that it is a “religion of peace,” when the historical record shows otherwise.


 Religion is the magic word that stymies the West and its defenders. “We have to respect Islam, they claim, “because it’s a religion. It is untouchable by common reason and morality just as ours is untouchable.”

5 comments:

Edward Cline said...

One reader, an expert on Islam, commented, "Textbooks for Muslim students in American madrassas state very clearly, “Islam is not a religion. It is a complete way of life.”

We need to take them at their word & hold them to account before Article VI of the US Constitution."

Edward Cline said...

Any religion can be deemed a “way of life.” Deference to and obedience to Allah was an integral part of that life.

Teresa said...

You couldn't be more right, Ed. Excellent blog.

Edward Cline said...

A reader wrote: "You gotta hand it to the Islamists Ed - they know how to hide behind our religious protections far better than we are at pointing out the ruse.

The answer to this quandary is so simple - declare Islam what it actually is - a supremacist political ideology. The only difference between Islam and Nazism is that the Muslims declared Muhammad a god and the Germans did not make Hitler a deity."

revereridesagain said...


I agree that identifying Islam as a supremacist political ideology is not only valid but essential. However, people who claim the United States as "a Christian nation" are not likely to do that to another major religion even as its devotees are holding scimitars to their throats. We are not, of course, a "Christian" nation but the nation of the Enlightenment, but the Christians don't want to admit that either.

I ran into this story on Robert Spencer's excellent JihadWatch site. Spencer, to his credit, identifies Islam as both a political and a fanatical religious enemy. However, religion is seldom left out of the equation. For instance, Lauren Southern is an outstanding commentator on the danger of Islam, but in this clip almost the first words out of her mouth are, "We've rejected Christianity." So, because not all of us believe the Little Lord Jesus and his Heavenly Father will swoop down out of Heaven at the End Times and solve our Islam problem, we are doomed. Take that to its logical conclusion -- logic being something to which at least most Christians give lip service -- and we would find ourselves in an epic war between their "End Times" and the Muslims' "Last Day". There is a disturbing amount of commentary to that effect on conservative sites. (I'd rather watch "Ragnarok", trash but at least it was funny in spots. This prospect is anything but.)

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/07/partners-in-terror-you-be-the-judge

And to any Christians who are offended by my terminology? Yes, I AM fed up with your nonsense and no longer willing to bestow on it a respect I would not give to Santa Claus or any other myth.