Thursday, January 25, 2018

The OIC’s Censorship

Thuggish organizations like Antifa do the grunt work and fist-swinging for the Organization of Islamic Conference (formerly Cooperation) OIC.  Masked and hooded, Antifa shuts down unwanted speech and speakers that question and reveal the Left’s totalitarian means and ends, and physically attacks its supporters. The OIC doesn’t need to send Islamic propagandists here, though it has a legion of them, such as CAIR, the ISNA, the MSA, and the ICNA.  

Clueless or indifferent social media owners do the work of Sharia and the OIC, too, such as Mark  Zuckerberg, who, among his many, many faults, promised Germany’s Angela  Markel  to help police the German Internet to crush criticism of her immigration policies.

Members of the OIC are definably criminal psychopaths. They want their Islamic/Sharia fantasies to come true, to show how Islam is “superior” to all other faiths and ideas, regardless; they wish their diktats about what may or may not be said (mostly may not) to come to fruition.  They work to impose Sharia on the West, and globally, for the sake of exerting power over their betters. Their demented reward is to feel omnipotence for having the West under their command. They’re akin to the mad scientist of the TV series “Gotham” who proves his electrical talents and his alleged existential efficacy by electrocuting people. 

I made the remark on Gatestone that sentenced criminals in France pass on their jihadist philosophy to new criminals because being a criminal is copasetic to their approach to life and prison dawah would help to “justify” and understand a new prisoner’s incarceration. 

Converting to Islam by prisoners is a way to rationalize one's criminal predilections and character.  "I rape women, rob people, and attack them."

The organization states that it is "the collective voice of the Muslim world" and works to "safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony."

Note that it is the “collective voice of the Muslim world,” and not of anyone else’s world or voice: only the Muslim worlds and voice.

Outspoken opponents of Islam and the Islamization of a Western country throughout Europe, in this case, Britain, are arrested, punished, and duct-taped to teach them and other opponents a lesson that one may not oppose the OIC with impunity. Britain First leader deputy Jayda Fransen gave her speech in Ireland and then was flown to Britain to face charges. In Finland, Finnish politician Sebastian Tynkkynen was arrested and fined for posting anti-Islam posts on Facebook. It was not the first time. If you endorse the OIC’s Sharia agenda, all you need to do is “complain” about someone’s social media post.  The pseudo-omniscient speech police will knock on the “offender’s” door and haul him away.

Western governments do the dirty business that the OIC does not want to risk performing itself. It might give everyone else the wrong impression that it is malign. It’s better to let Western governments to smash opponents in the name of “law and order.”

Meanwhile, in Germany's new censorship law, which has introduced state censorship on social media platforms, came into effect on October 1, 2017.

Barack Obama ordered that the DHS and other terrorism- fighting U.S. agencies remove all references to Islam from their documents.

Illegal immigrants a no-no term, according to CNN and MSNBC’s Joy Reid. The preferred term is “Dreamers.” The change in terminology is doubtless a side-effect of the OIC’s insistence of”correct” words. Doubtless those who regard “illegal immigrants” as derogatory and demeaning think that all people who enter and settle in the U.S ., especially if they are illegal, as being entitled to respect and rights.
The New York Times, friend of Dreamers, and Sharia

Obama coined the term “Dreamer” and it caught on with the MSM and the Democrats.

Obama was also President when two Muslims tried to attack the Garland, TX “Draw Mohammad” event on May 3, 2015. How committed to the Islamic and OIC agenda was he?  Was the attack a secret arrangement between Obama and FBI Director James Comey? Comey had been reinstated as FBI director by Obama in 2013 after occupying that office since 1972, and being reconfirmed by the Senate. 

Given Obama’s demonstrable devotion to Islam is it too far-fetched to imagine that Comey “Green-Lighted” the Garland  attack, selecting a pliable FBI agent to communicate closely with the attackers?

Obama said, 

In Cairo, at Cairo University, I made clear that America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam.”
The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” (speech to United Nations General Assembly, 2012-09-25)

So, the participants and planners of the Garland, TX drawing contest had to be taught a lesson. This could not help but please the OIC, except  that the attackers, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi, were killed in the act. Comey had to have known what the agent, UCE-1 (and other agents) was up to. Had the attack been successful resulting in multiple casualties, would that have given Obama the excuse to ban all depictions of Mohammad, and impose censorship? Did he have knowledge of the FBI-ISIS partnership? Was UCE-1 a rogue FBI agent, with his own ax to grind?

Bosch Fawstin's winning image of Mohammad
On March 24, 2015, an undercover FBI agent (referred to by the FBI as ‘UCE-1’) contacted Hendricks on social media, posing as a Muslim who was interested in joining the ISIS cell.
Just before the event was set to begin, the FBI sent another email bulletin which contained ‘a list of suspected extremists who […] were interested in the event.’ The bulletin included information about ‘Simpson’s general interest’ in the event, along with a ‘photo and possible vehicle license plate,’ but it gave ‘no notice that he might be headed that way or planning an attack on the draw-Muhammad gathering.’ Former FBI Director James Comey would later claim that ‘[a]t the time, the FBI had no reason to believe that Simpson intended to attack the event.’ The Garland Police Department’s security operations for the event were already underway when the email bulletin was sent, and was ‘one of many emails sent [to the Department] on that day,” so “no one saw [the email] until after the attack.’ The numerous FBI agents on the ground at the event made no effort to alert local law enforcement officials that Simpson posed an imminent threat.”

Simpson was under surveillance by the FBI, but its agents had no reason to alert local law enforcement or the event?

Was UCE-1 the only rogue FBI agent present at the Garland event? Just how many members of the ISIS-friendly FBI were there in the vicinity? Did they belong to the “secret society” that has just been revealed? How many still work for the FBI? Possibly there is an obscure Federal law that indemnifies agents in the course of their lawful duties (protecting the agents from lawsuits, while working to protect the U.S. and its citizens). But I don’t think there is a law that indemnifies agents who commit treason and sic Muslim agents on Americans. UCE-1 emailed Simpson, “Tear up Texas!”

The whole FBI role in the Garland attack is shocking and an eye-opener. UCE-1 should be identified and sent to prison, together with Comey and Obama.


Edward Cline said...

It is coming out that special counselor Robert Mueller, who presumes to question Donald Trump about his alleged "Russia" collusion, was the FBI director who ordered all law enforcement training materials scrubbed of all references to Islam and Muslims. Not only that but he helped rich Muslims in Florida leave the U.S. after 9/11.

Tom McCaffrey said...

I think there are elements on the left and in the deep state who, after eight years of Obama, really did not expect ever again to have to surrender control of the government to Republicans. They have yet to reconcile themselves to the reality of Trump's presidency. Their dream of permanent Democratic control was not all that farfetched; after a huge influx of immigrants from third-world countries and, now, two generations of free-college-indoctrination-for-all-who-want-it, California has become permanently Democratic. I fear that the rest of the country is not far behind.