Friday, December 29, 2017

Islam is Terrorist-Free

Islam is Terrorist-Free


She knows who you are.

So, here’s the OIC (The Organization of Islamic Conference or Islamic Cooperation), but even though every terrorist act has been committed with the sanction or encouragement of the OIC,  Congress has failed to designate as a terrorist organization; it refuses such a labeling. Is this a symptom of mental illness, or the cowardly squirmies?
Pamela  Geller  has the story here. The bill designating the OIC as a terrorist organization met defeat twice:
(It)… failed for two terms, 2015-16, and 2017-18….
2015: (H.R.3892) The House had 69 Republicans and 2 Democrats, totaling 71, while
(S.2230) the Senate had 7 Republicans but no Democrats; and
2017: (H.R.377) The House had 75 Republicans but no Democrats, while
(S.68) the Senate had 4 Republicans but no Democrats.
Did the bills get out of committees?
2015: The House’s Judiciary Committee voted in favor (17-10) as amended, but
no action in Senate Judiciary’s Foreign Relations Committee; and worse,
2017: No action in Judiciary committees of both the House or Senate.
Were there substantive changes? The bill (2017) deleted the findings of facts from the bill (2015).
(1) – (7) Multiple countries have declared the Society of the Muslim Brothers ( … “Muslim Brotherhood”) a terrorist organization or proscribed the group from operating in their countries: Syria; Russian Supreme Court; Egyptian court and government; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Cabinet of the United Arab Emirates; and the previous two backed by the Foreign Minister of Bahrain.
Congress? No, Congressmen and Senators would rather not alienate their Muslim voting blocs. Besides, there is a “freedom of speech” issue, as though the OIC cared about “freedom of speech,” which it works to ban everywhere if it criticizes Islam (through its mouthpiece here, The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
I’m nuts. Every law enforcement authority says so.
Robert Spencer writes on Jihad Watch:
The word “Islamophobia” is not the same as anti-Muslim bigotry, which any reasonable person should oppose. “Islamophobia” is broader, and is analogous with Islamic blasphemy laws. Any criticism of Islam, any attack on Islamic supremacism and jihadist ambitions, renders one “Islamophobic.”
Wikipedia notes that:
The first recorded use of the term in English, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, was in 1923 in an article in The Journal of Theological Studies. The term entered into common usage with the publication of the Runnymede Trust's report in 1997. The term began to rise even more after the bombing of September 11th. Because radical Islam was a new topic, so was the hate towards Islam, which created the term "Islamaphobia."Kofi Annan asserted at a 2004 conference entitled "Confronting Islamophobia" that the word Islamophobia had to be coined in order to "take account of increasingly widespread bigotry".
Or, try this:
The term “Islamophobia” was invented and promoted in the early 1990s by the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), a front group of the Muslim Brotherhood. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad -- who was with that organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected IIIT's ideology -- now reveals the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as a weapon to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and silencing them….
Although the term was coined in the early 1990s, “Islamophobia” did not become the focus of an active Brotherhood campaign until after 9/11. Since that time, Islamist lobby organizations (including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR) and Muslim civil-rights activists have regularly accused the American people, American institutions, law-enforcement authorities, and the U.S. government of harboring a deep and potentially violent prejudice against Muslims. The accusers charge that as a result of this "Islamophobia," Muslims are disproportionately targeted by perpetrators of hate crimes and acts of discrimination.
Of course.  The OIC is an affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood.  The West, and especially America, it says, must be brought down by their “own miserable hands.” Even if we have to behead the blasphemers.
Written sometime in 1987 but not formally published until May 22, 1991, Akram's 18-page document listed the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded "organizations of our friends" that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions and turning the U.S. into a Muslim nation. These "friends" were identified by Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims "that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands ... so that ... God's religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions."

Akram was well aware that in the U.S., it would be extremely difficult to promote Islam by means of terror attacks. Thus the “grand jihad” that he and his Brotherhood comrades envisioned was not a violent one involving bombings and shootings, but rather a stealth (or “soft”) jihad aiming to impose Islamic law (Sharia) over every region of the earth by incremental, non-confrontational means, such as working to “expand the observant Muslim base”; to “unify] and direct Muslims' efforts”; and to “present Islam as a civilization alternative.” At its heart, Akram's document details a plan to conquer and Islamize the United States – not as an ultimate objective, but merely as a stepping stone toward the larger goal of one day creating “the global Islamic state.”
One reader, Cathy Spears, asks the obvious: why is Islam called the "religion of peace"?
 Because what Islam means by “peace” is literally death. When Muslims no longer need to practice “fitna,” or the struggle to be faitful to Allah, then there will be “peace.”
In 2014, I published The Black Stone, set in February 1930, in San Francisco, in which the hero encounters agents of the Muslim Brotherhood, who are pursuing the New York reporter who stole the Black Stone from the Ka’aba in Mecca. The early Brotherhood is usually depicted as too
It isn’t his aunt’s recipe for apple strudel.
It’s a how-to formula for submission.
The OIC is a large bloc in the UN, with multiple entities in the various departments representing its interests. Its hands are in every conceivable committee and goal that would busy the parasites of the U.N.: “Palestine,” family affairs, UNESCO, science and the technology, education, and economics.  Among other things, it is invested in the suppression of gay rights, sports, and supposedly women’s rights.
The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation is an international organization founded in 1969, consisting of 57 member states, with a collective population of over 1.6 billion as of 2008. The organisation states that it is "the collective voice of the Muslim world" [the ummah]and works to "safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony".
On 25 September 1969, an Islamic Conference, a summit of representatives of 24 Muslim majority countries (most of the representatives being heads of state), was held in Rabat, Morocco. A resolution was passed stating that
"Muslim government would consult with a view to promoting among themselves close cooperation and mutual assistance in the economic, scientific, cultural and spiritual fields, inspired by the immortal teachings of Islam."
Six months later in March 1970, the First Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers was held in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.[5] In 1972, the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC, now the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation) was founded.
[M]any Muslims have aspired to a pan-Islamic institution that would serve the common political, economic, and social interests of the ummah (Muslim community) since the 19th century. In particular, the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the Caliphate after World War I left a vacuum.
In short, the OIC’s long-term goal is to revitalize the Caliphate with the purpose of taking over the world via the dhimmfication of (especially with the help of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the dictator of Turkey and would-be Caliph, Western politicians, the U.N., and the ceaseless proselytization thru other venues, chiefly the MSM. It wishes to criminalize “Islamophobia,” or, as Hillary Clinton once told the OIC, to “shame” it.  It supports BDS (boycott, divest, and sanction), or the ban of Israeli products. (Israel is its obsession; it cites the beginning of the OIC on a fire in a mosque that occurred in 1969, and automatically blamed it on the Jews.) It condemns terrorist acts, especially those committed by Muslims, because such actions embarrass the OIC and its agenda, and give it a “bad” press. It endorses the fantasy of a “two-state” solution to the “Palestine” problem; that is, a means to
Indefatigable
destroy Israel.
The OIC is dedicated to making the world, and especially America, submit to Islam and bringing “peace” to it. The Islamic brand of peace.

No comments: