They’ll come knocking on your door soon in various costumes, some of them downright scary. They’re not kiddies, but full grown adults, and if you don’t give them what they want, they’ll do worse than soap your door or lather your car in shaving cream or “key” your car’s finish. They have much, much worse in mind. They’ll seize your house, or burn it down with you in it.
|A Halloween mask that should be found in Walmart|
You all recognize his decaying, decrepit visage, don’t you? It’s the kind of face you’d encounter if you opened a coffin after it had been sitting in the sun for two or three days. Or for a week. Of course, it’s George Soros, the man(?) who wants to see Israel reduced to ashes and overrun by Palestinian Muslim savages, America reduced to the status of Sweden, France, and Germany (also overrun by Muslim savages), America’s white population whipped into chattel slavery, the global economy run by his statist, mercantilist rules, who has proposed that the Internet be closed to anyone who questions his Marxist agenda for an “open society”, a man[?] whose “best years” of his life were when he was helping the Nazis steal other Hungarian Jews’ property, who wants to remake the world in his own “Dorian Gray” image. He is a creature whose blood must not be red, but rather greenish black bile.
“If truth be known, I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood,” fantasies which “I wanted to indulge … to the extent that I could afford. (George Soros, Underwriting Democracy, p. 3)
Soros today recalls the German occupation of Hungary as “probably the happiest years of my life.” (Michael Lewis, “The Speculator,” New Republic (January 10-17, 1994)
“I realized [as a young man] that it's money that makes the world go round,” says Soros, “so I might as well make money.… But having made it, I could then indulge my social concerns.” Invariably, those concerns center around a desire to change the world generally—and America particularly—into something new, something consistent with his vision of “social justice.” (Faisal Islam, “Rich Man, Wise Man” (Observer: March 10, 2002)
This man(?) holds such a depth of malice for America and the West that he’d rather see them destroyed, and he has poured most of his ill-gotten gains into ensuring that this comes about. His “Open Society” Foundation is surely a glaring misnomer, for it advocates anything but an “open society,” but rather a society closed to individualism, national sovereignty, and laissez faire. About Soros’s Open Society Foundation
The term “open society” had been originally coined in 1932 by the French philosopher Henri Louis Bergson, to describe societies whose moral codes were founded upon “universal” principles seeking to enhance the welfare of all mankind—as opposed to “closed” societies that placed self-interest above any concern for other nations and cultures. [Philosopher Karl] Popper readily embraced this concept and expanded upon it. In his view, the open society was a place that permitted its citizens the right to criticize and change its institutions as they saw fit; he rejected the imposed intellectual conformity, central planning, and historical determinism of Marxist doctrine.
Soros’s “open society,” however, in all its manifestations, would be a suffocating straightjacket of intellectual conformity (political correctness), central planning (Soviet or Nazi or Obama style), and the government-mob organized hounding of anyone who criticized or threatened the statist status quo. (See the vitriolic opposition to Donald Trump’s presidential candidacy by the intellectual class, the MSM, and the #NeverTrump Republicans, for a taste of how “open” that kind of society can be.)
|Soon she will be as ugly as her America-hating mother.|
Huma Abedin is The Muslim Brotherhood’s “inside man” in American government and especially in Hillary Clinton’s career in Washington. What would Huma Abedin look like without undergoing a total Vanity Fair make-over and being subjected to all of Hollywood’s cosmetic special effects arts to make her presentable to the public? Nothing, I think, you would want to wake up next to in the morning. Unless you were Hillary Clinton. Hillary’s “confidante” and political gadfly has been a permanent presence in the Clinton claque for years. She has no security clearance whatsoever, it having been waived at the insistence of Clinton. See my article, “Huma Abedin” on Rule of Reason from February 2016, “Huma Abedin: Wicked Witch of Islam.”
|Would like to be appointed to the Supreme Court|
Barack Obama needs no introduction here. His record of destruction of this country is “legend.” Shall we name the ways: ObamaCare, unrestricted immigration of the cultural and political enemies of this country to bolster the Democrats, a refusal to credit Islam for the horrendous terrorist attacks world-wide and in this country, the destruction of our military, the destruction of the coal industry, his numerous crony capitalist scandals and failure, and on and on. Quite a “legacy” of sticking it to the country in the name of Saul Alinsky.
|Cackle, cackle! Cough! Cough!|
There is Hillary Clinton, another wicked witch, another protégé of Alinsky, who promises to complete the nihilist work begun by Obama. She can’t wait to get her hands on the country. Among her first priorities as “president” will be the shutting down or shackling of the Internet and anyone in it who objects to her policies which would also complement her dedication to Sharia law. She hosted an OIC conference. This comports well with the Soros proposal to close the Internet to all but supporters of the “closed society.”
Let us now turn to a bigger band of Halloween tricksters and treaters: the MSM. While the new thug/killer of The Walking Dead, Negan, has become the preferred bête noire of the series.
I think I’ve figured out why the MSM is smitten with Hillary; it’s the same reason why Negan’s minions obey
him, although he’s armed with only a baseball bat and most of his
followers are armed with automatic weapons any one of which could cut him to
pieces. No one dares oppose him. It’s
because they like it that way, they can live with subservience. Freedom is
an anathema to them. They’d rather be told what to do, and why, they’d rather
be psychologically and physically subservient to a tyrant, even though they
have full knowledge of Hillary’s crimes, misdemeanors and treason. They’re
comfortable with it. Turning Negan away from your door and not giving him any
candy (which he’s already claimed as not yours anymore can earn you an instant
bashing of your head with his
baseball bat, questioning the ends and means and character of Hillary
Clinton will earn you a similar fate: the end of your career, your financial
ruin, banishment from journalism, perhaps even an untimely death
(there have been precedents
of the latter punishment).
|Hillary's alter ego: Negan of The Walking Dead|
Kowtowing to Negan has the same mental roots as kowtowing to Hillary.
|They're comfortable in the proximity of evil|
Take a look at this photo of the U.S. press adoring Hillary on her new campaign plane. Is this not frightening? These are not only adults, but “journalists.” Do not these bobble heads fit the psychological profile of cultists? Are they not in ecstatic thrall to the very symbol of evil? The apotheosis of evil and unmitigated corruption – because they “work,” because evil seems to have more “efficacy” than good? Are they not on the same level as Negan’s hundreds of gun-toting slaves? Perhaps it’s the prospect of being a new “insider” or being appointed to Hillary’s cabinet.
You really want to know what drives anyone to sell his self-respect. As The Walking Dead’s fan base let its fascination and obsessions be known to the producers – who have tailored the new Seasons to these scary preferences – the MSM has let its preferences be known. Hillary’s and her husband’s crimes roll off their psyches like water off of a duck. They’re comfortable with it all; it saves them the trouble of moral judgement and the necessity of having the least fealty to truth and reality.
“To hell with Hillary’s crimes,” they all chortle. “We want to help make the world as she envisions it. It’s not right to pass moral judgments on her.”