Saturday, August 27, 2016

The Rule of Reason: A Last Great Hope

What follows is an especially articulate and unedited endorsement of Donald Trump, who, following the primaries, has become the Republican Party’s de facto nominee for President. Trump’s statements fly in the face of the political establishment’s policy of stealth socialism and submitting America to “global” priorities and agendas. Trump is an outsider not beholden to the socialist GOP,
and his statements and positions are already eviscerating the “Grand Old Party” and sending its flock of status-quo hens and chickens fleeing hither and yon like headless chickens in the Washington barnyard. We know, however, given the GOP’s caliber, and also as the “Me, Too” party that takes its lead from the looting, welfare state Democrats, that members of the GOP are conspiring to block Trump’s nomination by fair means and foul.  But, a clearer and more accurate policy statement you won’t find in the news media or from any other former or prospective candidate.  Edward Cline



Why Trump Deserves to Win the American Election

by Olivia Pierson  April 28, 2016


"My foreign policy will always put the interests of the American people, and American security, above all else. That will be the foundation of every decision that I will make. America first will be the major and overriding theme of my administration."  Donald J Trump.

If Americans still care about the legacy they once wrought out of a raw but magnificent continent, if they still give a damn about prosperity, security and freedom, then Trump ought to be their man.

Watching from a far off country gives one a certain measure of objectivity when viewing the American Presidential elections, but one thing is indisputable: love him or hate him, Trump oozes the All-American spirit of advancement, achievement and strong familial ties.

Since 2008 and the election of President Obama, the world has watched America slide backwards.  Grownup politics has been replaced by a revolting imposter – Social Justice Warrior politics.  I’ve often thought Obama looks like a guy who cares more about just getting an approving hug from any random stranger than he does about the success of his own country; a country which in many respects has always played an impossibly important part in helping to forge the future of the whole world. Obama has been a boy playing at being a president, with dangerous results.

In direct contrast to the current president, Trump is a real man, and a real achiever.  He’s the stuff of gruff charm and hard-out competence, whose appeal largely has its roots in the appeal of the classic Alpha male. He’s big, bold, brash and boastful, at least he is when he’s locked in a competition – and given that the competition to become a president is outrageously difficult, that’s exactly the sort of spirit I want to see win.

But apart from these personality impressions, I feel a sense of relief when I hear him state some of his policies.  I didn’t realize how much I’d given up on ever hearing a presidential hopeful say the things which are now going to go down in history as Trumpisms.

1. A temporary ban on Islamic immigration into the United States. 

This is way beyond important. It should have been an imperative straight after the perpetrators of 9/11 wreaked their terrible murder on US citizens one clear and beautiful morning. This was a profound act of war, but its soldiers were hiding.  It doesn’t matter if many Muslims might be innocent, so long as they are the adherents of a bloody and backward superstition which is hostile to the West, whose holy-book not only allows for, but actually calls for acts of murder, they should be viewed with rational suspicion by anyone who claims to care about having a developed society. The safety and security of American citizens needs to be upheld first, second and last by their president. The United States is not automatically responsible for being the benefactor of all peoples who live in foreign lands – even if they do just want to go to Disneyland.

Now that Trump has laid out his Foreign Policy, a policy which is basically a return to "no foreign entanglements" that are not within the self-interest of the United States (unless they are paid handsomely for the privilege), Americans can rest assured that if he should become President Trump, they will have the hardest of fighters, the toughest of negotiators and a man of immense instinctive talent representing their foreign interests.

2. The building of The Wall (which Mexico is going to pay for).

As Carly Fiorina pointed out many times in the primary debates, the stemming of illegal immigration into the States through the southern border has been talked about and debated, with only half-ass measures being enacted for about 30 years.  Action to actually stop this flow has been pitiful.  We now know that  ISIS can and have sent operatives straight through that border.  Are people under the illusion that the Mexican government is going to extend big efforts to put a stop to this? They don’t even stop their own people (good and bad) from crossing.  So now a nominee who has a spectacular history of building huge, complicated projects is stating that he’s going to build a wall across this rogue border.  Amen!  The safety and security of American citizens needs to be upheld first, second and last by their president. The United States is not automatically responsible for being the benefactor of all peoples who live in foreign lands – even if they do just want to go to Disneyland.

3. Rethinking NATO.

It has become typical now of the news media to shriek and spit every time Trump says something sane.  His desire to rethink NATO is a classic example of this. As it now stands, NATO consists of: Albania, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States.

NATO’s stated purpose is this (taken from the official NATO website): the Alliance’s creation was part of a broader effort to serve three purposes: deterring Soviet expansionism, forbidding the revival of nationalist militarism in Europe through a strong North American presence on the continent, and encouraging European political integration.

Not only has Soviet expansionism into Ukraine and Crimea occurred without any backlash from NATO, the whole world has watched Europe staunchly uphold its weak-spirited commitment to fashionable cradle-to-grave socialism and unlimited “tolerance.” In so doing, their commitment to multiculturalism has been totally paramount.  They have allowed unprecedented Islamic immigration into its respective countries, (some more than others) culminating recently with the Islamic Immigration Crisis; welfare dependent Muslims which Germany is forcing all other countries in the EU to accept, whether they want them or not.  EU hopeful, Turkey, is negotiating this flood of people, who are most assuredly not just coming from war-torn Syria!  Deeply hostile to Russia, who he accuses of intensifying the conflict and resultant refugees into his land (an accusation I have no doubt is true), Erdogan threatens to further flood Europe with many more millions of Muslim refugees.  Read here about the next coming Immigration Crisis.

Turkey is a deeply Islamic nation which refuses to make war on ISIS but would happily bomb the Kurds to oblivion.  They are no longer the Turks of Kemal Ataturk’s liberal imperatives. President Erdogan is the devout Muslim who states that, “there is no such thing as moderate or immoderate Islam: Islam is Islam, and that’s it!” (And here is the West trying to sort Islam out into nice, neat, palatable categories – that which is lethal, that which is peaceful, that which is in between.) We should take Erdogan at his word – he knows a thing or two about that of which he speaks.  Peaceful, violent, latent, nominal or radical, Islam is all one ideology.  The differing sects (among them Shia & Sunni are just the narcissism of small difference – similar to a Methodist arguing with a Jehovah’s Witness, except neither the Methodist nor the JW will shed each other’s blood over their differences).  Those who kill in Islam’s name are the ones who take their religion literally.  They are the ones whom their prophet would call “Good Muslims.”

A return to Nationalism and a breaking away from the EU may just be the only way for these small countries to protect their cultures from being swamped and Islamicized (under orders from multicultural-obsessed Brussels) – yet one of NATO’s stated reasons for existence is to forbid Nationalist militarism.  Can you see a poisonous dilemma brewing here which America will be pulled into? Trump can; hence his wariness on NATO and his bold statement to rethink it all.  It will take a mighty heart and diplomatic brain to sort through the mess that is NATO, especially with Russia fanning the flames with its dangerous bedfellows ie: Iran and Syria. The safety and security of American citizens needs to be upheld first, second and last by their president.  The United States is not automatically responsible for being the benefactor of all peoples who live in foreign lands – even if they do not want to go to Disneyland.

 4. Enough with the PC Feminazi Nonsense! (Okay, not technically a policy)

When Megyn Kelly, in the first Fox-hosted Primary debate, asked the awful question of Trump...

    “You’ve called women you don’t like fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals... For the record, it was way beyond Rosie O’Donnell... Your Twitter account has several disparaging comments about women’s looks. You once told a contestant on the Celebrity Apprentice it would be a pretty picture to see her on her knees. Does that sound to you like the temperament of a man we should elect as president? And how do you answer the charge from Hillary Clinton – that you are part of the war on women?”

...it caused a furore which went on for months and months, and to which Donald Trump remained admirably unapologetic.  He knew he was being hit hard by the Humourless-Harriet; politically correct feminist nonsense which has emasculated men for several generations now.  Frankly, Kelly was dealing with the wrong type of man, and has suffered Trump’s contempt ever since; a thing which has hurt her as the top darling of the Fox News Channel in a contentious election, more than it has hurt Trump.  She may as well have asked him, “When did you stop raping your wife?”   Trump was rightly galled that this was considered to be "good moderation" from the nation's best journalists.

This is where even Trump’s foibles are All-American in their essence.  He is a lover of beautiful women, of which Kelly is one, but if women try this emasculation shit out on the likes of him, especially drawing on examples of his alleged behaviour from his life as a non-political businessman, they’re toast.  He subsequently refused to be interviewed by her, he verbally hammered her in public and he even declined to attend a debate which she was to moderate.  The ongoing nature of the feud was devastating to Kelly, so much so that she recently said she was thinking about not renewing her contract with Fox because it had been hard, not only on her, but also on her boss Roger Ailes.

It is so typical of the feminist mindset to want to play hardball with the men, then run and cry to other men to take a stand to defend you.  Kelly made the comment that she was disappointed her colleague, Bill O’Reilly, didn’t make more of an effort to defend her.  Why would he?  She had been warned by her co-moderators Brett Baier and Chris Wallace, when they were running over the questions before the fatal debate, that if she persisted in that kind of questioning, there would be a lot of pushback (their male instincts were right on cue).  She insisted on having her way. Well, she didn’t just get pushback, she managed to alienate a potential future president from her network (which since seems to have resolved itself, no thanks to Megyn's own charms).

Kelly then invited the disgusting, sneering, morbidly obese, even uglier than Rosie O’Donnell, Marxist lowlife, Michael Moore, on to her show to bottom -feed with her about Trump’s decision to skip the next debate. Michael f**king Moore!!  A man who is militantly hostile to Western values and everything America has traditionally stood for.  They giggled and indulged in words of admiration with each other - enough to make a grown-girl hurl.  Suddenly Trump’s insults about Megyn’s being a “bimbo” and “overrated” started to make an awful amount of sense. 

It has now come to light that in order to calm this feud, Kelly has reached out to Trump personally and gone to Trump Tower for a meeting.  The result is an upcoming one-on-one interview with Trump on Fox, scheduled for May 17th. We’ll see how that works out, but I’m betting Grandma’s creamiest pearls that Kelly will conduct herself with a renewed sense of respect, and for that Trump will reward her with his time and attention.

Trump won by not fawning over an uppity little femme with a fashionably gratuitous absorption in resentment of the opposite sex (the feminist agenda).  If this is going to be typical of what is in store for Hillary should he win the nomination, I can’t wait.  Especially considering that hiding in Hillary’s filthy feminist closet are toe-curling stories about her own personal war on the women who  allege that they were sexually assaulted by her own husband, and then systematically besmirched and threatened by Hillary in the Clintons’ long ascent to attain the Whitehouse.  If she thinks Trump is going to go easy on her because she’s choosing to build her campaign around playing the “woman” card, then she is in for the ride of her life.  One I believe she will lose, because some part of me still actually believes that while scum often does rise to the top, it can be blown away by the vim of a powerful challenger with right on his side.  I hope America proves me right.

BIG EDIT: I'm just going to add right here that I have noticed many, many Right-leaning people and above all, Libertarians, suffer from a massive snob-factor in holding on for dear life to their Trump Derangement Syndrome. People who consider themselves "intellectuals" take issue with his apparent lack of smarty-man clever talk about The Constitution and Individual Rights, forgetting that the human quality of AUTHENTICTY trumps, and should trump cleverdickness on any day of the week in human affairs. People of aesthetic sensibility take issue with his Liberace hair do, his Nouveau Rokoko palatial, gold-drenched residence and white piano.

People who only care about the Free Market forget that they have never lived in one, but somehow Trump is this radical, unusual newcomer who is going to rob them of it (forgetting America does business everyday with countries who do not observe anything close to a free market standard). There are also those who take issue with Trump's wanting to ban Islamic immigration, totally dropping context of the fact that America has been in a war since 9.11 with Islam - that Islam has declared and America has pretended to be oblivious to. I am so disgusted with these people for pretending to have such "great judgment" yet are not able to see their own shocking propensity for context dropping, despite their self-proclaimed intellectual prowess.

They, in their various critiques, get to feel superior to Trump in some f**ked up way - and that is the only emotion which carries them along in their criticism and Derangement Syndrome. I hope they have the good grace to let me know when they have created a family fortune of 10 billion plus, have the heart, guts and competence to want to save their country from becoming a "once was" civilization. I hope they let me know when they have 2 ex-wives as good friends, along with five high-functioning kids who absolutely adore them - and, more importantly, want to learn from them. I won't hold my breath.

http://www.oliviapierson.org/blog/why-trump-deserves-to-win-the-american-election

Friday, August 26, 2016

The “Mental Illness” of Islamic PC

Daniel Greenfield comments on how the authorities (East, West, South, and North) engage in tongue-twisting, mental gymnastics to avoid “offending” the Islamic Ummah by ascribing the latest stabbing, rape, or murder by a member of the Muslim flock to “mental illness” or lack of employment opportunities, and other external drivers. The Press complies with the explanations also for fear of raising the lice-ridden hackles of Muslims. The latest episode occurred in Australia.
A model of madness

The media is describing the Muslim terrorist as a French man. Because if it's anything the French are known for, it's shouting "Allahu Akbar". and stabbing random non-Muslims.
A French national allegedly shouted “Allahu akbar” during and after a stabbing attack that left a British woman dead and another Briton fighting for his life at a backpackers hostel outside of Townsville last night.
Possible extremist motivations for the attack are now being investigated by Queensland Police and the Australian Federal Police, with the man yet to be questioned by investigators.
Queensland Police Service Deputy Commissioner Steve Gollschewski said the 29 -year-old French man shouted the phrase following the attack at the hostel at Home Hill, south of Townsville, but police had not determined whether the incident was terror related.
Who knows? Maybe the "French" stabber was expressing his Francophonic distaste of Brits by shouting Allahu Akbar. 
“While this information will be factored into the investigation, we are not ruling out any motivations at this stage, whether they be political or criminal,” he told reporters in Brisbane.
“Investigators will also consider whether mental health or drug misuse factors are involved in this incident.”

Many stones will not be overturned in the search for a motive, particularly those marked with the telltale symbol of “Islam.” We don’t want to offend Muslims by blaming Islam for horrendous crimes randomly committed by a “radicalized” Muslim. “Allahu Akbar” just might be his misspoken utterance of “I’m a little teapot!” and the fellow had a speech impediment that aggravated his emotional outbreak!

So, heads are being scratched in Australia – call it a kind of infectious, epistemological psoriasis – in France, Britain, Germany, and in the U.S. because, you see, anyone shouting “Allahu Akbar” as he stabs away at a “random non-Muslim” cannot be said to be a jihadi or an “immigrant” or a “refugee.” That would be a defamation of the man’s character, and would come automatically under the rubric of “hate speech” and/or “Islamophobia,” which is by PC definition a “crime.” But if the evidence is overwhelming concerning his “motivation” and individuals refuse to grant it any role in the crime, who is the actual mentally ill person? Or is he a kind of mental doppelganger of the criminal?


The mental illness being reported has two classes of the afflicted: Muslims, who are by definition mentally ill (who else but someone not in his right mind would exalt a killer, rapist, bandit, all in the name of AllahWall – Wallah for short – as a moral ideal, and expect everyone else to acknowledge and defer to the sanity of the insanity, or else), and the Mainstream Media (MSM) or the Massagers of the Seven Mongoloids.
                                                                                                                
Let us examine mental illness.

A Wikipedia article begins:

A mental disorder (also called a mental illness,[1] or psychiatric disorder) is a diagnosis, most often by a psychiatrist, of a behavioral or mental pattern that may cause suffering or a poor ability to function in life. Such features may be persistent, relapsing and remitting, or occur as a single episode. Many disorders have been described, with signs and symptoms that vary widely between specific disorders….
   
Patterns of belief, language use and perception of reality can become disordered (e.g., delusions, thought disorder, hallucinations). Psychotic disorders in this domain include schizophrenia, and delusional disorder. Schizoaffective disorder is a category used for individuals showing aspects of both schizophrenia and affective disorders. Schizotypy is a category used for individuals showing some of the characteristics associated with schizophrenia but without meeting cutoff criteria.

Common mental disorders include depression, which affects about 400 million, dementia which affects about 35 million, and schizophrenia, which affects about 21 million people globally. Stigma and discrimination can add to the suffering and disability associated with mental disorders, leading to various social movements attempting to increase understanding and challenge social exclusion.

Let’s just say that Islam incubates all the categories of these “mental disorders,” especially if the “pattern of belief,” a certain language, and a skewed “perception of reality” figure largely in a Muslim’s daily thoughts and routines and infect everything he does or feels. From day one of his existence he is a product of the Islamic hatchery, taught to hove rigidly and unquestioningly in preparation to emerge as a devout Muslim (when he reaches biological adulthood or post-adolescence) and non-entity in the eyes of his imaginary deity. One could say that reaching maturity in an Islamic environment has steadily undercut and sabotaged his cognitive faculties and powers of reason, and that he is as much of “victim” of Islam as are the many thousands of non-Muslims killed by Muslims. Let us say that he sees the world, others, and himself with borrowed eyes, eyes as evil as Rasputin’s – or Mohammad’s.

But few of us have ever encountered a Muslim who was uncomfortable with the status of being a permanent mental cripple, and who would  never risk breaking from a lifetime habit of not thinking, of not fearing thought itself, and of  not feeling a seething hate of those who don’t hesitate to question and think. Your average jihadi down deep to the core of his soul (or of his mind) fears and hates reality more than he does the infidel. In the midst of raping, knifing, bombing, or torturing his victims, aside from shouting “Allahu Akbar!” his inner voice is screaming, “You did not conform to my reality! This is your punishment! You cannot be allowed to remain in existence! Wallah orders me to wipe you out! He does not really favor the compassionate! Die! Die and suffer! Be shamed! You are conquered!”

The average Muslim is as much a prisoner of Islamic Political Correctness as Westerners are prisoners of secular, mind-shackling political correctness. But while Western PC allows one some “elbow room” to negotiate reality, Islam locks Muslims in a mental straightjacket, one which disables whatever minimal link to reality they might have, and turns them into self-destructive Golems, or walking-talking, half-human automatons, many passive, others who do not feel “real” until they work themselves into a frenzy of malice. Every criminal action committed by a jihadi is meant to be a strike against reality, and destruction is perceived to be a corrective remedy, destruction for destruction’s sake, of the good for being the good. Wallah wills it! So it must be done! Else Wallah will frown at the candidate jihadi if he fails to act and deny him that perfect state of non-existence, Paradise.

Muslims might have an excuse for their mental illness. There can be none for Westerners such as Commissioner Gollschewski and his colleagues in Australia (and elsewhere around the globe). His job necessarily requires the grasping of criminal evidence, and if he refuses to grant evidence any role in his investigation, then he is of no use to anyone, he is guilty of a miscarriage of justice, and may as well be abetting the commission of more Islam-inspired crime. The same can be said about any cravenly PC dhimmi in law enforcement anywhere.

Complicit in abetting Islamic crime is the MSM, whose shoulders are heavily flaked with years of dandruff from its own congenital head scratching about Islam. The MSM is as delusional about Islam as are Muslims.

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

The Howlers of Our Moon Bats

Moon bat has replaced mooncalf as a colloquial term for a fool, halfwit, dunce, moron, etc. One could just as well say it is synonymous with Muslim and Progressive

Howling at the moon is an idiom meaning making an utterly ludicrous, transparently insane remark stated as a truism. It designates a statement that contradicts obvious or demonstrable evidence, and is contrary to what is clearly true, or to what is relevant to the facts. It isn’t certain yet why wolves howl at the moon, but we are certain that Progressivism and Islam cause human moon bats to howl at reality. Here are a few instances:

Reuters editors and the filterers of other news sources must have snickered when on August 17th they reported Chancellor Angela Merkel stating bald-faced that Germany’s violence is not caused by the “immigrants” or the barbaric “refugees.” They somehow didn’t bring rape, murder, and terrorism to Germany (or to Sweden, France, and other European nations). It’s those nasty jihadists who wish to terrorize Germany into submission. But they’ve already done that. They don’t practice the same Islam as the non-entities who can be seen on German streets pushing their welfare state paid prams of future “Germans.”

"The phenomenon of Islamist terrorism, of IS, is not a phenomenon that came to us with the refugees," Merkel said at an election campaign event for her Christian Democrats in the eastern state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern ahead of a regional vote on Sept. 4.
The influx of migrants, many of whom are Muslim, has boosted support for the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD), which is expected to perform well in elections in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and Berlin.
"We have said clearly that an Islam that works and lives on the basis of the constitution ... belongs to Germany," Merkel said.
She added that a type of Islam that did not stick to the constitution or accept equal rights for women had no place in the country.
Clueless or lying on her reelection stump, it does not occur to Merkel that Islam will not “stick to the constitution” of Germany, as Islam regards man-made law as an abomination to AllahWalla. Under Sharia law, there are no “equal rights” for women, nor for non-Muslim infidels, nor for homosexuals, nor for anyone else but Muslim males.

Which see

So, set you (O Muhammad [sal-Allâhu ‘alayhi wa sallam]) your face towards the religion (of pure Islâmic Monotheism) Hanîf (worship none but Allâh Alone). Allâh’s Fitrah (i.e. Allâh’s Islâmic Monotheism) with which He has created mankind. No change let there be in Khalq-illâh (i.e. the religion of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism), that is the straight religion, but most of men know not. (Tafsir At-Tabarî)}(Ar¬-Rûm:30)
And, apparently, Angela Merkel knows not of what she speaks. But, what she worry?  Islam belongs to and in Germany. "Former president Wulff said Islam belongs to Germany. That is true. I also hold this opinion," Merkel said at a news conference with Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, who also took part with other world leaders in the Paris march on Sunday.” [January 12, 2015] 

Rather, Germany now belongs to Islam, thanks to Wulff and Merkel, who opened the gates and borders to the migrant invasion. This would be a truer statement.

Let’s now turn to another moon bat, Tim Kaine, former governor of Virginia who helped to turn the cradle of the American Republic into a “blue state” vassal of Progressivism. On August 17th, Daniel Greenfield on FrontPage wrote of him, 

Hillary Clinton and her entourage have had everything undeservedly handed to them on a silver platter. And yet they never stop hating America.
Tim Kaine, Hillary's ridiculous buffoon of a VP, who is running as number two to a female presidential candidate, decided to take his ridiculous hatred of America to a new level by claiming that America is worse for women than Afghanistan.
Greenfield asks, “Does Kaine really believe that women have more political opportunities in Afghanistan than they do in America? Is he that stupid or does he hate his country that much?” I would answer both: He is that stupid and he hates America. But he keeps his thickness and malice in the background. 

Next up for a baying is our Community Organizer in Chief, Barack Obama, who, among his many other lies and gaffs, has claimed that “climate change” is more a threat to national security than is ISIS or hundreds of thousands of Syrian “refugees” of the Islamic persuasion who are being invited to emulate Angela Merkel’s invasion-by-invitation of this country. As the Free Beacon reported on December 1st, 2015, 

            A new SuperCut video contrasts doomsday rhetoric from the Obama administration about climate change with news clips of terrorist attacks, plane bombings and beheadings by the Islamic State.
            President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and Secretary of State John Kerry offer the following words in the video about climate change.
            “Today, there is no greater threat to our planet than climate change.”
            “No challenge poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change.”
            “It is indeed one of the biggest threats facing our planet today.”
            “Climate change is the threat multiplier.”
Far be it from Obama to realize that he is his own “threat multiplier.” But I think he knows it. Everything he has done over the last eight years has been to weaken the U.S. and to make it vulnerable to Islamic terror. He has been our first, blatantly, conscious “Evil Executive” in pursuit of unlimited and unopposed executive power. 


Of course, the Father of Hockey Sticks, Al Gore, worried that he will be forgotten, uttered his own inanity. Truth Revolt reported on August 23rd, 

After the floods had hit Baton Rouge, Louisiana, last week, former vice president and self-proclaimed global warming guru Al Gore coined the natural disaster as “one of the manifestations of climate change.”                                                    
As The Washington Times notes, news articles followed with the same line. The New York Times wrote, “Flooding in the South looks a lot like climate change.” The Green Party of Louisiana declared a “climate state of emergency.” And at least one meteorologist said “we’ve reached a new meteorological era” because of global warming, or climate change… or whatever they call it now.
So, that’s settled, right? Not according to most experts. Some see no evidence that links this flood to climate change, unlike global warming alarmists….
But then again, maybe Al Gore is just excited. It is the 25th anniversary of the World Wide Web, after all, and since he invented it, he’s probably just celebrating with something else he invented: global warming hype.
Not to be left out of the howling, is Secretary of State John Kerry, who competes with Vice President Joe Biden to utter the best and most memorable inanities. In November 2015 Breitbart put together a file of them:

BOSTON – Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry is a dunce, and has a record of making preposterously stupid and offensive statements dating back to 1971.
In fact, if you go onto Google and type in “John Kerry gaffe,” you will get 350,000 hits.
At the U.S. embassy in Paris Tuesday, he did it again, with perhaps his most obnoxious, tone-deaf public pronouncement yet. Speaking to State Department staffers, he compared the two Muslim terrorist massacres in France this year – shooting up the magazine offices of Charlie Hebdo and then last Friday’s celebration of diversity, which left 129 dead.
“There’s something different about what happened (Friday) from Hedbo,” the 71-year-old Yale graduate said, “and I think everybody would feel that. There was a sort of particularized focus and perhaps even a legitimacy in terms of – not legitimacy – but a rationale that you could attach yourself to somehow and okay they’re really angry because of this or that.”
Yes, he backed off, immediately and then again yesterday. But however you parse it, he rationalized slaughtering people for exercising free speech. This is the guy the Democrats promoted for president in 2004 as being “smarter” than his fellow Yale grad, George W. Bush, despite the fact that Kerry’s GPA was slightly lower.

Doubtless President Obama refers to Kerry, the “marry up to riches” parasite and the guy who claims to have “swift-boated” his Army rewards out the window, as one of his two prize dumb-ass honkies, the other being Joe Biden.

And the MSM pack loves to hear them howl, and often joins in the serenade with its own brand of inanity. But then the MSM is populated with its own species of moon bats, and they’re fanged and carry rabies.

The foregoing quotations are all "howlers," but they're not funny.